➙

Official Da 2166 9 1 Form in PDF

The DA 2166-9-1 form is an essential tool used for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. This form provides a structured way to assess an NCO’s duties, attributes, and overall potential, ensuring that evaluations are consistent and comprehensive. Understanding how to accurately complete this form is crucial for both raters and rated NCOs to facilitate effective performance management.

Open Form Here

Content Navigation

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential tool used in the U.S. Army to evaluate the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) at the rank of Sergeant. This form serves as the NCO Evaluation Report, capturing vital information about the rated NCO, including their name, Social Security Number, rank, and unit details. It is structured to provide a comprehensive overview of the NCO's duties, performance, and potential for future assignments. The form is divided into several parts, starting with administrative data, followed by sections for authentication by the rater and senior rater. Each section requires specific details, such as the rater's and senior rater's names, ranks, and signatures, ensuring accountability in the evaluation process. The performance evaluation section assesses various attributes, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement, with clear criteria for rating each area. Additionally, the form emphasizes the importance of counseling dates and provides space for comments, allowing for a thorough review of the NCO's performance and growth. This structured approach not only aids in individual assessments but also contributes to the overall effectiveness of Army leadership and personnel management.

↓ PDF File

Discover More Templates

Ucc 1-308 Without Prejudice - A violation of the affiant's rights incurs a significant monetary penalty.

How to Fix Written Mistake on Car Title When Selling - By signing, a contractor acknowledges full payment plus any extras that may have been agreed upon.

How to Get Proof of Dog Vaccinations - Encourages proactive pet health management.

Steps to Using Da 2166 9 1

Completing the DA 2166-9-1 form is essential for the evaluation of non-commissioned officers (NCOs). This form requires accurate information and signatures from both the rater and senior rater. Follow the steps below to ensure the form is filled out correctly.

Part I - Administrative Data:
- Enter the rated NCO's full name (Last, First, Middle Initial).
- Provide the SSN or DOD ID number.
- Indicate the rank of the rated NCO.
- Input the date of rank.
- List the PMOSC (Primary Military Occupational Specialty Code).
- Fill in the unit, organization, station, ZIP code or APO, and major command.
- Specify the status code.
- Provide the UIC (Unit Identification Code).
- State the reason for submission.
- Indicate the period covered by the evaluation (from and through dates).
- Enter the number of rated months.
- Fill in any non-rated codes.
- Specify the number of enclosures.
- Provide the rated NCO's email address (.gov or .mil).
Part II - Authentication:
- Enter the name of the rater (Last, First, Middle Initial).
- Provide the rater's SSN or DOD ID number.
- Have the rater sign the form.
- Fill in the date (YYYYMMDD) of the rater's signature.
- Indicate the rater's rank, PMOSC/branch, and organization duty assignment.
- Provide the rater's email address (.gov or .mil).
- Enter the name of the senior rater (Last, First, Middle Initial).
- Provide the senior rater's SSN or DOD ID number.
- Have the senior rater sign the form.
- Fill in the date (YYYYMMDD) of the senior rater's signature.
- Indicate the senior rater's rank, PMOSC/branch, and organization duty assignment.
- Provide the senior rater's email address (.gov or .mil).
- If applicable, enter the name of the supplementary reviewer (Last, First, Middle Initial).
- Specify the rank, PMOSC/organization duty assignment, and whether a review is required (Yes/No).
- Provide comments if necessary.
- Have the supplementary reviewer sign the form.
- Fill in the date (YYYYMMDD) of the supplementary reviewer's signature.
- Provide the supplementary reviewer's email address (.gov or .mil).
Part III - Duty Description (Rater):
- Enter the principal duty title.
- Provide the duty MOSC.
- Describe daily duties and scope, including people, equipment, facilities, and dollars.
- List areas of special emphasis.
- Specify any appointed duties.
Part IV - Performance Evaluation (Rater):
- Indicate APFT pass/fail/profile status and date.
- Provide height and weight, confirming if within standard.
- Evaluate character based on Army values and provide comments.
- Assess presence and provide comments.
- Evaluate intellect and provide comments.
- Assess leadership and provide comments.
- Evaluate development and provide comments.
- Assess achievement and provide comments.
- Complete the rater overall performance section.
Part V - Senior Rater Overall Potential:
- Select the box that represents the rated NCO’s potential.
- Provide comments regarding the rated NCO's potential.
- List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment.

Key takeaways

Filling out and using the DA 2166-9-1 form is a critical process for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs). Here are some key takeaways to ensure accuracy and compliance:

Accurate Information is Essential: Each section of the form requires precise details about the rated NCO, including their name, Social Security Number, rank, and unit information. Ensure that all entries are correct to avoid delays or issues.
Understand the Purpose: This form serves as an evaluation report that assesses the performance and potential of an NCO. It is important for career progression and should reflect a fair and honest assessment.
Signature Acknowledgment: The rated NCO’s signature indicates that they have reviewed the report. This does not imply agreement with the evaluations but confirms that the administrative data is accurate.
Performance Evaluation Criteria: The form includes various categories for evaluation, such as character, presence, and intellect. Each category must be assessed thoroughly, and comments should support the ratings provided.
Senior Rater Input: The senior rater plays a crucial role in determining the overall potential of the rated NCO. Their evaluation should be based on comparisons with other NCOs in the same grade, providing a broader context for the assessment.

Misconceptions

Understanding the DA 2166 9 1 form can be challenging, and several misconceptions often arise. Here are seven common misunderstandings about this form, along with clarifications for each.

Misconception 1: The DA 2166 9 1 form is only for senior NCOs.

This form is specifically designed for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) at the rank of Sergeant (SGT). It is not limited to senior NCOs; rather, it is a crucial tool for assessing performance at various levels.

Misconception 2: Signing the form means agreement with the evaluation.

When a rated NCO signs the form, it does not imply agreement or disagreement with the assessment. Instead, the signature verifies that the administrative data is correct and that the NCO has seen the completed report.

Misconception 3: The evaluation process is solely based on the rater’s opinion.

While the rater's perspective is significant, the evaluation also involves input from the senior rater and may include supplementary reviews. This multi-layered approach ensures a more comprehensive assessment.

Misconception 4: The form does not require any supporting documentation.

In fact, the DA 2166 9 1 form may include enclosures that provide additional context or evidence regarding the NCO's performance. These enclosures can be critical for a thorough evaluation.

Misconception 5: The form is only relevant during annual evaluations.

The DA 2166 9 1 can be used for various reasons, including quarterly evaluations or when there is a change in duty assignment. It is not limited to a specific timeframe.

Misconception 6: All comments on the form are optional.

While some sections may allow for brief comments, others require detailed feedback. For example, comments regarding performance in areas like character and leadership are essential for a complete evaluation.

Misconception 7: The form is only for documenting negative performance.

This form serves to highlight both strengths and areas for improvement. Positive performance should also be documented to provide a balanced view of the NCO’s capabilities.

Preview - Da 2166 9 1 Form

HQDA#:

Attachments Menu

NCO EVALUATION REPORT (SGT)

For use of this form, see AR 623-3 and DA PAM 623-3;; the proponent agency is DCS, G-1.

SEE PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT

IN AR 623-3

PART I - ADMINISTRATIVE DATA

a.NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

c. RANK

d. DATE OF RANK

e. PMOSC

f. UNIT, ORG, STATION, ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAND

g. STATUS CODE

h. UIC

i. REASON FOR SUBMISSION

j. PERIOD COVERED

FROMTHRU

YEAR MONTH DAY

k.RATED MONTHS

l.NONRATED CODES

m. NO OF ENCLOSURES

n. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

PART II - AUTHENTICATION

a1. NAME OF RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

a2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

a3. RATER'S SIGNATURE

a4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

a5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

a6. RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

b1. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

b3. SENIOR RATER'S SIGNATURE

b4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

b5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

b6. SENIOR RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

c1. SUPPLEMENTARY		c2. NAME OF SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER	c3. RANK		PMOSC/	ORGANIZATION		DUTY ASSIGNMENT
REVIEW REQUIRED?		(Last, First, Middle Initial)			BRANCH
YES	NO

c4. COMMENTS		c5. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE		c6. DATE(YYYYMMDD)			c7. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS
ENCLOSED?							(.gov or .mil)
YES	NO

RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the assessments of the rater and senior rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data in Part I, the rating officials and counseling dates in Part II, the duty description in Part III, and the APFT and height/weight entries in Part IVa and IVb are correct. I have seen the completed report. I am aware of the appeals process of AR 623-3.

d1. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL

LATER

d2. RATED NCO'S SIGNATURE

d3. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

PART III - DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)

a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE

b. DUTY MOSC

c.DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities, and dollars)

d.AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS

e.APPOINTED DUTIES

PART IV - PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)

a. APFT Pass/Fail/Profile:

Date:

b. Height:

Weight:

Within Standard?

(Comments required for "Failed" APFT, "No" APFT, or "Profile" when it precludes performance of duty, and "No" for Army Weight Standards.) Reset Item a. APFT/Pass/Fail/Profile

c.CHARACTER: (Include bullet comments addressing Rated NCO's performance as it relates to adherence to Army Values, Empathy, Warrior Ethos/Service Ethos, and Discipline. Fully supports SHARP, EO, and EEO.)

MET	DID NOT MEET
STANDARD	STANDARD

COMMENTS:

DA FORM 2166-9-1, NOV 2015

Page 1 of 2

APD LC v1.00ES

RATED NCO'S NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)	SSN (or DOD ID No.)	THRU DATE

PART IV - PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)

d. PRESENCE: (Military and professional		COMMENTS:
bearing, Fitness, Confidence, Resilience.)
MET	DID NOT MEET
STANDARD	STANDARD

e. INTELLECT: (Mental agility, Sound judgment, COMMENTS:
Innovation, Interpersonal tact, Expertise.)
MET	DID NOT MEET
STANDARD	STANDARD

f. LEADS: (Leads others, Builds trust, Extends COMMENTS:
influence beyond the chain of command, Leads by
example Communicates.)
MET	DID NOT MEET
STANDARD	STANDARD

g. DEVELOPS: (Creates a positive command/ COMMENTS:
workplace environment, Fosters esprit de corps,
Prepares self, Develops others, Stewards the
profession.)
MET	DID NOT MEET
STANDARD	STANDARD

h. ACHIEVES: (Gets results.)	COMMENTS:
MET	DID NOT MEET
STANDARD	STANDARD

		RATER OVERALL PERFORMANCE
i. I currently rate	NCOs in this grade.
COMMENTS:

		PART V - SENIOR RATER OVERALL POTENTIAL
a. Select one box representing Rated		b. COMMENTS:
NCO’s potential compared to others in the
same grade whom you have rated in your
career. I currently senior rate
NCOs in this grade.
NCOs in this grade.
MOST QUALIFIED
HIGHLY QUALIFIED
QUALIFIED
NOT QUALIFIED

c. List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment (3-5 years).
Successive Assignment:	1)	2)	Broadening Assignment:

DA FORM 2166-9-1, NOV 2015			Page 2 of 2
			APD PE v1.00ES

Document Specs

Fact Name	Description
Purpose	The DA 2166-9-1 form is used to evaluate Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army, specifically for the rank of Sergeant. It provides a structured way to assess their performance and potential.
Governing Regulations	This form is governed by Army Regulation (AR) 623-3 and DA Pamphlet (PAM) 623-3, which outline the policies and procedures for NCO evaluations.
Privacy Considerations	The form includes a Privacy Act Statement, which ensures that personal information is handled in accordance with privacy laws and regulations.
Signature Requirements	Signatures from the rater, senior rater, and the rated NCO are required to validate the evaluation. Each signature confirms the accuracy of the information provided in the report.